data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d95fd/d95fd7875ef123848dae29cb7b3cd9e2871150f5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d4fc/5d4fc38ddf7d453a4f5595320ced4ec94db49228" alt=""
Loesch was somewhat coy about who she was speaking about, but then revealed it in an exchange on Twitter (again reading from the bottom, up):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2458f/2458f221d3cc4e634040121e4a11fb5a0f2d0a8a" alt=""
Those three names would be John Wayne Tucker, Ed Martin's challenger in the Republican primary. To confirm, I asked Tucker if she was blacklisting him. This is how he responded:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fdcc/9fdccbca35eb2c12b7eeae2c7c06623d6d0569b2" alt=""
If you'll note above, Loesch's lame excuse for not having Tucker on as a guest is that it would be equivalent to "electioneering." This is a little odd, considering that she's had his opponent Ed Martin on her show a number of times, including March 30 and March 2nd of this year. So apparently it's not "electioneering" to have Loesch's favorite GOP insider candidate on the show, but it would be "electioneering" to have his grassroots conservative challenger on?
This fits with what I've been saying for a long time. The leaders of the St. Louis Tea Party are less interested in a genuine grassroots movement than in bolstering their own standing in the mainstream media and among Republican operatives. The main "revolution" they're working towards is a revolution of the guest list of the Chris Matthews, Larry King, and Larry Kudlow shows. And if they can get the same old Republican operatives like Roy Blunt and Ed Martin elected along the way, well then they're fine with that too.
Great post, Adam! You are right on the money.
ReplyDelete