Akin Staffer Goes to Work for Americans For Prosperity

KMOX is reporting that Todd Akin's St. Louis District Director, Patrick Werner, is going to become the state director of Americans for Prosperity in Missouri. Americans for Prosperity, if you recall, is the astroturf group bankrolled by the billionaire oil-refinery magnates David and Charles Koch.

Of course there's really nothing to see here, because I'm sure that AFP won't be spending all of their time and money attacking McCaskill in the upcoming election....right?

Loesch Lies About Climate Change At Koch Brothers Rally

At a rally this weekend organized by astroturf Americans for Prosperity, which just happens to be funded by the Koch brothers, who just happen to own a number of oil refineries and bankroll the leading climate change denial groups in the country, Dana Loesch declared that Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" was not allowed into British schools because it was "fiction:"

Here's the typical fact-free nonsense of Loesch:

And the British high court, told the educational system that they're not allowed to show this film. Why? Because it's fiction. Because it's propaganda. They said there was a number of things wrong with the film...wrong with the facts used to support this theory in the film. Nine of them were super-huge...they had a bunch of other complaints...but they're not allowed to show it in school districts.

Actually, the judge wrote that the film was, "substantially founded upon scientific research and fact" and said that he had "no doubt" that, "Al Gore's presentation of the causes and likely effects of climate change in the film was broadly accurate." The judge did note 9 errors, but allowed the film to be shown in schools as long as it was accompanied by a"guidance note" that presented a contrarian point of view on those nine claims.

Among the claims that the judge said were persuasive and "supported by a vast quantity of research published in peer-reviewed journals worldwide and by the great majority of the world'd climate scientists":

• (1) global average temperatures have been rising significantly over the past half century and are likely to continue to rise ("climate change");
  (2) climate change is mainly attributable to man-made emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide ("greenhouse gases");
  (3) climate change will, if unchecked, have significant adverse effects on the world and its populations; and
  (4) there are measures which individuals and governments can take which will help to reduce climate change or mitigate its effects."

So, in absolutely no way does this ruling support Loesch's claim that climate change is "fiction" or "junk science." And her claim that the film can't be shown in schools is wrong.

Loesch was, however, able to dispell some rumors about her education by stating that she had, in fact, completed a 9th grade science course and that it provided all of the information she needed to know that the world's leading scientists are all secret socialists plotting to steal money from upstanding citizens like the Koch brothers.

The full video, with even more ridiculous antics, can be found Doug Edelman's vimeo page.

Video Shows Carl Bearden Reporting to Billionaire David Koch

(Carl Bearden speaking at the town hall meeting he set up with Senator McCaskill's staff)

The Post-Dispatch wrote an excellent editorial last week documenting the astroturf activities of Carl Bearden, the former director of Missouri's Americans for Prosperity and someone who played a crucial role in starting the St. Louis tea party. Bearden organized a rally outside of Senator McCaskill's office where the tea party falsely claimed that someone from McCaskill's office "gave them the finger" (in fact, it was someone from an adjoining office who was upset that the tea party was banging on their windows). McCaskill, in typical weak-kneed Democrat fashion, apologized anyway and agreed with Bearden to hold a meeting that was covered by Fox News and largely kicked off the tea party's summer of angry, obnoxious, town halls. So Bearden played a crucial role in a pivotal "birthing" moment for the St. Louis tea party, and likely played a big role in turnout efforts for their other events. He also organized some of the original tea party events in other parts of Missouri.

Americans for Prosperity is funded by the billionaire right-wing idealogue David Koch. Koch has denied being involved, saying at one point, ""I've never been to a tea-party event. No one representing the tea party has ever even approached me." And later:

In addition, no funding has been provided by Koch companies, the Koch foundations, Charles Koch or David Koch specifically to support the tea parties.

However, a new video released today from the documentary Astroturf Wars, in the words of Huffington Post columnist Kevin Grandia, shows Americans for Prosperity employees reporting back to David Koch about the tea parties at their annual meeting. Carl Bearden is in the video. At the 1:50 mark, you can see Bearden saying, "keep your hands off my healthcare:"


This "movement" was started for one reason and one reason only: to promote the interests of an exclusive group of the wealthiest Americans. The ideologues in charge already get more breaks and take advantage of more loopholes than everyone else, but they're still not satisfied.

h/t Brian Matthews for the link.

Is Voter Caging Possible In St. Louis?

The group Save Wisconsin's Vote 2010 released documents and video yesterday detailing a coordinated plan between American's for Prosperity, the state Republican Party, and local tea party groups to disenfranchise voters in Wisconsin for the 2010 November elections.

Here's the basic outline of the plan in Wisconsin:

• The Republican Party of Wisconsin will use its "Voter Vault" state-wide voter file to compile a list of minority and student voters in targeted Wisconsin communities.

• Americans for Prosperity will use this list to send mail to these voters indicating the voter must call and confirm their registration information, and telling them if they do not call the number provided they could be removed from the voter lists.

• The Tea Party organizations will recruit and place individuals as official poll workers in selected municipalities in order to be able to make the challenges as official poll workers.

• On Election Day, these organizations will then "make use" of any postcards that are returned as undeliverable to challenge voters at the polls, utilizing law enforcement, as well as attorneys trained and provided by the RPW, to support their challenges.

As stated on the website, there are two primary ways in which voter caging is used to suppress voting:

First, is to force as many voters as possible to cast provisional ballots, which require voters to follow-up the day after an election for the ballot to be counted. Historically, about 35% of all provisional ballots are never counted. Additionally, voters whose registration is challenged at the polling place are unlikely to have the required material to complete an Election Day registration, meaning the voter will be turned away at the polls.

The second goal is to create long lines at the polling place as the caging operation challenges voter after voter. Many people cannot afford to sit in line to vote for hours on end. Long lines discourage voters and many simply leave without casting a ballot.

Groups can use demographic information to selectively target districts with high minority and student populations.

So my question is, if Americans for Prosperity, the Republican Party, and the tea party are planning on doing this in Wisconsin, is there any reason to think they won't try to do it elsewhere, and particularly in Missouri?

First of all, we know that Americans for Prosperity has a strong presence in Missouri, and helped to kick off the original tea party events in St. Louis. In Missouri, AFP was run by a right-wing lobbyist and former state Representative named Carl Bearden, who has since left and formed a new astroturf group called United for Missouri.

Second, the local St. Louis Tea Party has stated repeatedly that they believe themselves to be "at war" and that therefore any form of unethical behavior is justified in achieving their goal of winning the election. As a reminder, here's a quote from a former St. Louis tea party member, James Greyfalcon, discussing the group:

Somebody had sent me a message (I had criticized some of the really negative, jacked-up, over the top rhetoric coming from a lot of people) and the message was, "you shouldn't say anything about that because you're being divisive. Extreme times call for extreme measures." And I said to myself, "see that's the kind of garbage...they're looking for people like that. They're looking for people who feel so disempowered that they'll surrender their integrity and Christian values to some operative who's willing to tell them "it's OK to do whatever it takes whatEVER it takes because your liberty's at stake, so I'm going to smear somebody, or you wanna try and convince, maybe, one of the black people in your group, to do something that....to smear maybe a black politician in a video or something, that person should just go along with it because that's what you do in a war.

And when people don't go along with that, I'm finding that all of a sudden there's indignation and confusion and fear on the parts of these people who were once so...they have so much control over these people who are scared.

There's no indication that anything has changed. In fact, just this week, Bill Hennessy reiterated his belief that "Winning isn't everything. It's the only thing."



Furthermore, Ed Martin has already set up a group of "poll challangers," making explicit reference to ACORN (the right-wing's favorite bogeyman that no longer exists in St. Louis):

The Count Every Vote Unit is a team of people who will canvass area polling places to help ensure our area’s elections take place in a fair, honest and impartial manner. The Count Every Vote Unit is comprised of attorneys, poll watchers, and poll challengers. They will broadcast any problems they see via Twitter, Facebook, and our website edmartinforcongress.com. Anyone who suspects fraud or sees anything suspicious is reminded to call and report it to the Secretary of State’s office.

“As someone who has never run for office before, there is a lot to learn. The problem of voter fraud and the need to fight every day to make every vote count is something that I know from my time working on the Election Board. I will be vigilant in my quest to ensure that every eligible person is able to vote and to make sure voter fraud is not an issue,” said Ed Martin.

As chairman of the St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners, Ed Martin was tasked with cleaning up city elections and he did just that. He stood strong and took on ACORN’s long standing attempts to corrupt our voting process. Ed Martin vows to continue to help empower voters.

Missouri’s Secretary of State, Robin Carnahan, has a cozy relationship with the former group ACORN, now called MORE or Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment. Robin’s former chief of staff and current campaign manager has direct ties to ACORN.

In his call for "election challangers," Martin explicitly says that the way to cut down on fraud is to require voters to present photo IDs:

One obvious way to help cut down on fraud is to require voters to present photo ID, something both Robin and Russ Carnahan oppose. Congressman Russ Carnahan said “No” to requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections.

However, current Missouri law does not require photo IDs for voting. In fact, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled such a law unconstitutional in 2006.

Unfortunately, however, sometimes the actual law does not matter very much when you have a group of dishonest or misinformed "poll challengers" who try to discourage people from voting using every means possible. This is something that needs to be watched very carefully in the St. Louis region. This is an area where the "enthusiasm gap" can make a big difference: a small group of fired up ideologues on the Right could potentially do a lot to cut down the votes of groups that traditionally vote for Democrats.

Feedback on this post is highly encouraged. Please let me know if you think this is possible and, if so, what can be done about it.