Showing posts with label st. louis blogs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label st. louis blogs. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Thanks to the Riverfront Times!

I found out earlier today that this blog was named a finalist for Best Political Blog in St. Louis. I'm proud to be in the company of Occasional Planet, PoliticMo, the Beacon Backroom, and even the St. Louis Tea Party blog. Thanks to whoever nominated this blog, to the other writers, and to the RFT for putting it on. Some of my favorite local blogs are also listed under "Best Neighborhood Blog" and "Best Architecture Blog," so I hope you check them all out.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Thanks for the RFT Nomination!

Thanks to the folks who helped St. Louis Activist Hub become a finalist for the Riverfront Times 2011 Web Awards. We are now in the great company of other blogs like St. Louis Volunteen, Slow Food St. Louis, Preservation Research, Next Stop STL, Show Me No Hate, and Urban Review STL.

Thanks to those who voted for me and thanks to the RFT for doing a great job highlighting local bloggers and covering stories and issues that the mainstream media passes by.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Dana Loesch Compares Gay Marriage to Bestiality

Dana Loesch is one of those conservatives who loves to point out how they are totally friends with people in the LGBT community. But in my opinion, this combined with her behavior since joining Breitbart's site just raises the question: what's worse? Actually being a bigot, or being someone who knows better but nevertheless promotes bigoted ideas in order to further your career?

A day after calling Eric Boehlert George Soros's "butt boy" because he destroyed her ridiculous claims, Loesch wrote a post on gay marriage in which she featured a cartoon of Kanye West kissing a fish:

The cartoon, of course, was from a South Park episode, and the joke there made at least a little sense. But the picture had absolutely nothing to do with Loesch's post about gay marriage. Nothing, that is, except being a reference to the right wing's idiotic claim that "once you allow gay marriage you'll have to allow people to marry their pets."

Furthermore, Loesch's arguments were idiotic, claiming that the RNC candidates' support of the right-wing National Organization for Marriage's (NOM's) position on marriage was a "defense of religious freedom." Perhaps this point would be worth discussing if the question at the RNC debate had been whether the candidates supported forcing churches to marry gay couples. But, as clearly pointed out by Tommy Christopher (the blogger Loesch was attacking), and as could be seen by anyone who watched the debate, that was not the actual question. The question was whether they supported the position of NOM, which is the position that gay marriage should be completely banned. In other words, it is clearly a position that is at odds with religious freedom, because it bars churches from being able to decide for themselves whether they will marry gay couples. Her arguments are, as usual, complete nonsense.

Of course, Loesch should and does know better. However, she's already decided that she'll do anything for fame and money, and that includes throwing friends and allies under the bus when it suits her. What a shame that these are precisely the attributes that make the right-wing media love her.