Gotta say, I don't really understand what the Gateway Journalism Review takes itself to be doing. If you call yourself a "Journalism Review" and say in the mission statement that you aim for the public to have the "most credible, fair media possible," then shouldn't you be among the first to call out charlatans and grifters, rather than the last? Maybe write stories when someone is dishonest on CNN, rather than at teh Blaze? It's not really providing any accountability if you only call out a media personality a full year after every thinking person stopped taking the person seriously.
But yeah, don't get your news from the Blaze. Can't argue with that.